The applicable section of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738, § 23) permits a defendant to appeal, on the ground of exeessiveness, from a court's order specifying its intended resentence. We perceive no basis for reducing the proposed sentence. The record fails to support defendant's contention that the resentencing court erroneously penalized him twice for the same violation of a 2003 cooperation agreement that led to his initial A-I felony conviction and his sentence of 15 years to life. In proposing a resentence that was two years more than the minimum permissible sentence, the court appropriately considered various factors including the quantity of drugs that were involved and the extent of defendant's criminal conduct.