AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

DAVID BYNUM et al., Respondents, v. MARK SCHEINER et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action, insofar as asserted against the appellant Mark Scheiner, was settled by so-ordered stipulation dated November 30, 2004 (hereinafter the stipulation), pursuant to which Scheiner agreed to pay the plaintiffs $5,000 in two equal installments. The stipulation also provided that if Scheiner failed to make those payments, the plaintiffs were entitled to a judgment in the sum of $24,000. It is undisputed that Scheiner failed to make the payments required under the stipulation. A judgment dated February 10, 2005, was entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against Scheiner in the principal sum of $24,000.

The defendants moved to vacate the judgment. The Supreme Court correctly denied the motion because the defendants failed to demonstrate grounds to relieve Scheiner from the stipulation ( see McKenzie v Vintage Hallmark, 302 AD2d 503, 504; cf. Aivaliotis v Continental Broker-Dealer Corp., 30 AD3d 446, 447-448; Weitz v Murphy, 241 AD2d 547, 548; Bank of N.Y. v Forlini, 220 AD2d 377, 378).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BYNUM v. SCHEINER
(Oct 24, 2006)