AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES AROKIUM, Appellant.

The court properly denied the Mapp/Dunaway branch of defendant's suppression motion without a hearing. Defendant's assertions of innocent conduct at the time of his arrest, and his general denial of "the allegations in the accusatory instrument" failed to either controvert the specific information that was provided by the People concerning the prior criminal activity that formed the predicate for his arrest, or to provide any other basis for suppression ( see People v Jones, 95 NY2d 721; People v Soto, 284 AD2d 158, lv denied 96 NY2d 924; see also People v Lopez, 5 NY3d 753; compare People v Hightower, 85 NY2d 988).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. AROKIUM
(Oct 19, 2006)