Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent State of New York.
The Court of Claims properly found that the claim was time-barred, as any alleged wrong occurred at the date of the claimant's suspension in May 2001 ( see Court of Claims Act § 10 [3]; CPLR 214), and further that the claimant failed to adequately describe the nature of his claim ( see Court of Claims Act § 11 [b]).
The claimant's remaining contentions are without merit.
[ See 8 Misc 3d 1007(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50982(U) (2005).]