Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

NARVAL NARCISSI, Petitioner, v. ROBERT ERCOLE, Superintendent of Green Ha

ORDER

NINA GERSHON, District Judge

Petitioner requests this court to stay and hold in abeyance his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pending state court proceedings on his unexhausted ineffective assistance of counsel claim. In Rhines v. Weber, the Supreme Court held that, while district courts have discretion to grant stays, "stay and abeyance should be available only in limited circumstances." 544 U.S. 269, 277 (2005). Specifically, the Court held that "stay and abeyance is only appropriate" when: (1) the district court determines there was good cause for the petitioner's failure to exhaust his claims first in state court; and (2) the unexhausted claims are not "plainly meritless." Id.

Petitioner's letter, dated October 8, 2006, does not demonstrate or even allege "good cause" for failing to exhaust his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in state court. Moreover, petitioner's submission provides no details concerning the factual or legal basis for petitioner's claim. Without this information, the court cannot grant a stay and abeyance or determine whether petitioner's unexhausted claim has any merit. Therefore, petitioner is ordered to supplement his request by January 1, 2006, with papers showing: (1) good cause for failure to exhaust his effective assistance of counsel claim; and (2) that the new claim is not plainly meritless. Respondent shall file a response to petitioner's additional submission within 30 days of its filing.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NARCISSI v. ERCOLE
(Nov 1, 2006)