AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PARIS POWELL, Appellant, v. ANTHONY CIPOLLARO et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants' respective motions to strike the complaint. Although striking a pleading pursuant to CPLR 3126 is a drastic: remedy it is warranted where a party's conduct is shown to be willful and contumacious ( see Beneficial Mtge. Corp. v Lawrence, 5 AD3d 339). The inference that the plaintiff's conduct was willful and contumacious may be drawn from his repeated failure to respond adequately to discovery demands and to court directives to comply with those demands, and from the absence of any adequate explanations for his failure to comply ( see Devito v J J Towing, Inc., 17 AD3d 624; Schwartz v Suebsanguan, 15 AD3d 565; Rowell v Joyce, 10 AD3d 601).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POWELL v. CIPOLLARO
(Nov 14, 2006)