AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DASHAUN M. HOLIFIELD, Appellant.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16) and one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.39 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal was voluntary ( see People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and it did not violate public policy ( see generally People v. Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 573-574). Defendant's contention with respect to the severity of the sentence is encompassed by the waiver of the right to appeal ( see Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256). Although the further contention of defendant that his plea was not voluntarily entered survives the waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. DeJesus, 248 AD2d 1023, lv denied 92 NY2d 878), the record establishes that defendant's contention lacks merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE OF N.Y. v. HOLIFIELD
(Nov 17, 2006)