Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
Contrary to the defendants' contentions, Brill v City of New York ( 2 NY3d 648) applies to cases such as the present one, where a movant makes a motion for summary judgment after the expiration of a court-ordered deadline which is shorter than the 120-day deadline set forth in CPLR 3212 (a) ( see Miceli v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 NY3d 725; Brooks v Ross, 24 AD3d 589). Since the defendants failed to demonstrate the existence of good cause for their failure to make their motion for summary judgment prior to the expiration of the court-ordered deadline, the Supreme Court should have denied the motion.