Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael FARR, Appellant.

[Editor's Note: This opinon is subject to modification or transfer to the superme court.]

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Farr (Farr) appeals the Sentence and Judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis (Court), the Honorable Jimmie Edwards presiding. Farr was convicted by jury of Delivery of a Controlled Substance, Section 195.211, and Possession of a Controlled Substance, Section 195.202. The Court sentenced Farr, as a prior and persistent offender, to respective concurrent sentences of fifteen and seven years, without eligibility for probation or parole.

All statutory references are to RSMo (2000).

On appeal, Farr argues that the Court erred when it admitted testimony and allowed closing argument comments regarding a connection between narcotics and gang violence. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FARR
(Nov 28, 2006)