AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

ROBERT D. JOHNSTON and MELANIE K. JOHNSTON PLAINTIFFS v. JASON BRISCO, et. al. DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

ROBERT DAWSON, District Judge

Currently before the Court is the Motion to Quash (Doc. 140) filed by Separate Defendants Jason Brisco, Lyle Smith and Paul Woodruff on November 30, 2006. On November 13, 2006, Plaintiffs faxed a pleading to counsel for Separate Defendants noticing Jason Brisco and Paul Woodruff for depositions on today's date, Monday, December 4, 2006. Separate Defendants contend they intended to appear for these depositions but anticipated difficulty in traveling to Fayetteville due to the weather, therefore, they filed this motion to quash. Separate Defendants state that they can be made available for a deposition on another date agreed to by the parties. Counsel for Separate Defendants advised the Court he mailed correspondence to Plaintiffs on November 30, 2006, advising them that he was moving to quash the deposition notice. However, it is unclear whether Plaintiffs received sufficient notice of Separate Defendants' intentions so as to avoid appearing for the depositions today.

The Court being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the motion (Doc. 140) is GRANTED and the deposition notice is quashed. However, counsel for Separate Defendants is ordered to consult with Plaintiffs today to determine an agreed upon date for the depositions and to promptly notify the Court once an agreement is reached.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSTON v. BRISCO
(Dec 4, 2006)