Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the malicious prosecution cause of action by demonstrating that the underlying criminal proceeding was not terminated in favor of the plaintiff ( see MacFawn v Kresler, 88 NY2d 859, 860; De Cicco v Madison County, 300 AD2d 706; Ellsworth v City of Gloversville, 269 AD2d 654). The underlying criminal proceeding in this matter was terminated as a result of the facial insufficiency of the criminal information and not on the merits of the matter ( see MacFawn v Kresler, supra). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its prior determination ( see MacFawn v Kresler, supra; Cahill v County of Nassau, 17 AD3d 497; Tzambazis v City of New York, 291 AD2d 397).