AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MAURICE COLLIER, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of his right to counsel at an investigatory lineup ( see People v Wilson, 89 NY2d 754; People v LaClere, 76 NY2d 670; People v Coates, 74 NY2d 244). The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record ( see People v Ortiz, 31 AD3d 580). Here, the court's determinations were supported by the record. Thus, the court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the identification testimony.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLLIER
(Dec 12, 2006)