AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of PATRICIA KAHL-LAPINE, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY J. LAPINE, Respondent.

Ordered that the order dated November 22, 2005 is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the mother's objections to the Support Magistrate's order ( see Matter of Mahoney v Goggins, 24 AD3d 668, 669). In reviewing a determination of the Family Court, great deference should be given to the determination of the Support Magistrate, who was in the best position to hear and evaluate the evidence, as well as the credibility of the witnesses ( see Matter of Musarra v Musarra, 28 AD3d 668, 669). The record supports the Support Magistrate's finding that the mother was responsible for a total of $1,947.53 in unreimbursed medical and dental expenses for the parties' children ( see Matter of Penninipede v Penninipede, 6 AD3d 445, 447; Matter of Ciccone v Ciccone, 287 AD2d 563).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF PATRICIA v. LAPINE
(Dec 12, 2006)