AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JACOB GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. FREDERICK BIERMAN et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants sufficiently established that they were residents of Nassau County rather than Queens County ( see CPLR 503 [a], [d]), and that the alleged malpractice occurred in Nassau County. The plaintiffs failed to adequately rebut this showing in their opposition papers. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' respective motions to transfer the venue of the action to Nassau County ( see CPLR 510; Magrone v Herzog, 304 AD2d 801; Pasley v St. Agnes Hosp., 244 AD2d 469).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDBERG v. BIERMAN
(Dec 26, 2006)