Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

Peter Mwasokwa, Petitioner, v. Alberto Gonzales, Respondent.

ORDER

STEPHEN McNAMEE, Chief District Judge

On November 29 2006, Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss filed a Report and Recommendation advising this Court that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the "Petition") (Dkt. 1) should be dismissed as moot because the Department of Homeland Security released Petitioner on an Order of Supervision on April 6, 2006. (Dkt. 12 at 2.) To date, Petitioner has not filed objections to Judge Voss's Report and Recommendation.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When reviewing a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this Court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made," and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983)).

By failing to object to a Report and Recommendation, a party waives his right to challenge the Magistrate's factual findings, but not necessarily the Magistrate's legal conclusions. Baxter, 923 F.2d at 1394; see also Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998) (failure to object to Magistrate's legal conclusion "is a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal"); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir. 1980)).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed Petitioner's Petition and, thereafter, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the record de novo, and no objections having been made by Petitioner thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss. (Dkt. 12.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED AS MOOT. (Dkt. 1.) The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to all parties as well as to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MWASOKWA v. GONZALES
(Jan 4, 2007)