Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ANTON ANTWAIN JONES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID DAY; CONNOR BLAINE; ERIN RESSLER; SHARON D'ELETO; DR. HARPER; PAUL STOWITSKY; and THOMAS JAMES, Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

THOMAS HARDIMAN, District Judge

Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on October 21, 2003 and was referred to United States Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On April 14, 2004, this case was transferred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 50), filed on December 1, 2006, recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the remaining Defendants (Doc. No. 43) be granted. Service was made on plaintiff at S.C.I. Greene. No objections were filed.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2007;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Day, Blaine, D'Eleto, Stowitsky and James (Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action as CLOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 50) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated December 1, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JONES v. DAY
(Jan 4, 2007)