AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In the Matter of DAVID WATTS et al., Petitioners, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION et al., Respondents.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

The determination of the Assistant Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter the Assistant Commissioner) that the subject property is not exempt from regulations concerning freshwater wetlands must be confirmed, as there is no evidence that the petitioners obtained final approval for their proposed project prior to the effective date of the Freshwater Wetlands Act ( see Environmental Conservation Law § 24-1305 [a], [c]).

Moreover, the Assistant Commissioner's determination denying the petitioners' application for a freshwater wetlands permit must also be confirmed as it was supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Kroft v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 7 AD3d 714).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are either unpreserved or without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE DAVID v. NEW YORK
(Jan 9, 2007)