Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contentions that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that the complainant suffered a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) and that the defendant knowingly violated an order of protection ( see CPL 470.05; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111, 1112; Penal Law § 10.00; § 15.05 [2]).
The defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel raised in his supplemental pro se brief may not be reviewed on direct appeal because they involve matter dehors the record ( see People v Campbell, 6 AD3d 623, 624).