Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MARK MILLER, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

KENT DAWSON, District Judge

Presently, the Court has before it the Report and Recommendation (#27) of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke entered January 11, 2007. In her report, Magistrate Judge Cooke recommends the denial of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#9). The parties had ten days from service of the Report and Recommendation to file objections to it. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(a). The time to file objections has passed and neither party has filed such. Moreover, the Court has reviewed the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 3-2(b). The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke entered January 11, 2007 shall be adopted. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#9) lacks merit.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (#27) of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke entered January 11, 2007 is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#9) is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. McDANIEL
(Feb 1, 2007)