AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK STERLING, Appellant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from an order denying in part his motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing of certain items of evidence ( People v Sterling, 6 Misc 3d 712). We conclude that County Court properly denied that part of the motion seeking testing with respect to those items because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested and had the results been admitted at trial, the verdict would have been more favorable to defendant ( see CPL 440.30 [1-a]).

We note that, in reaching our determination, we have declined to consider any evidence of events that took place after the issuance of the order on appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. STERLING
(Feb 2, 2007)