AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAYMOND A. PLAKSTIS, JR., Appellant, v. LIGHTHOUSE, LLC, et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondents.

The defendant Lighthouse, LLC (hereinafter Lighthouse), made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. It established, as a matter of law, that it neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly defective door ( see Singer v St. Francis Hosp., 21 AD3d 469; Lustenring v 98-100 Realty, 1 AD3d 574, 578). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of Lighthouse's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PLAKSTIS v. LIGHTHOUSE
(Feb 13, 2007)