Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, with costs.
The record supports the Family Court's determination that, based on a fair preponderance of the credible evidence, the husband engaged in acts which would constitute the offenses of disorderly conduct and harassment, warranting the issuance of the order of protection ( see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Laboy v Melendez, 27 AD3d 650; Matter of Kraus v Kraus, 26 AD3d 494; Matter of Cutter v Feldman, 23 AD3d 557; Matter of Marsha C v Latoya D., 224 AD2d 522; Matter of Pesce v Pesce, 223 AD2d 647).
The husband's remaining contentions are without merit.