AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of JOHN POPPE et al., Respondents, v. LAURA Ruocco, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"The question of visitation, which involves a determination of what is in the child's best interests, is left to the discretion of the court" ( Matter of Weis v Rivera, 29 AD3d 812, 813; see Lo Presti v Lo Presti, 40 NY2d 522, 527). An essential part of this inquiry is whether a meaningful relationship exists between the petitioning grandparents and the child ( see Matter of Weis v Rivera, supra; Matter of Principato v Lombardi, 19 AD3d 602, 603). The testimony at the hearing established that there was a meaningful relationship between the grandparents and the children. In addition, the testimony established that visitation would be in the children's best interests. Thus, under the circumstances, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in granting visitation with the grandparents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE MATTER OF JOHN v. RUOCCO
(Feb 13, 2007)