Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Glenda WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. TULSA COUNTY, Tulsa County Ju

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

¶ 1 In this case, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that today's decision in the companion case, Washington v. Tulsa County, (No. 103, 384), 2006 OK 92, 151 P.3d 121, disposes of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. Stat. tit. 12, chap. 15, app. (2001). Today's decision in the companion case renders moot the issues raised in this appeal.

¶ 2 IT IS THEREFOR ORDERED that the trial court's order refusing to vacate the dismissal of this action is summarily affirmed.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WASHINGTON v. TULSA COUNTY
(Feb 20, 2007)