Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellants' contention that the plaintiff lacked standing to commence this action pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 720 was not properly raised and, in any event, is without merit ( see Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; Kaplan v Queens Optometric Assoc., 293 AD2d 449, 450; Brown v Brown, 143 AD2d 248, 249).
The plaintiff established a sufficient basis for the appointment of a temporary receiver pursuant to CPLR 6401 (a) ( see Hoffman v Eagle Box Co., 305 AD2d 544; Matter of Kristensen v Charleston Sq., 273 AD2d 312; Modern Collection Assoc, v Capital Group, 140 AD2d 594; Nesis v Paris Intl. Light., 184 AD2d 485, 486; Nelson v Nelson, 99 AD2d 917).
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit ( see State of New York v Chatsworth Realty Corp., 284 AD2d 260, 261; 3-12 White, New York Business Entities P B1202.01 [Matthew Bender 2005]).