Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff's contentions were previously raised and decided against him, or could have been raised on a prior appeal in this matter ( see Stone v Stone, 19 AD3d 404). "Therefore, reconsideration of these issues is barred by the doctrine of law of the case" ( Matter of Suzuki-Peters v Peters, 37 AD3d 726, quoting Palumbo v Palumbo, 10 AD3d 680; see Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 18 AD3d 551, affd 7 NY3d 320; Jacobs v Macy's E., Inc., 17 AD3d 318, 319).
We decline the respondent's request to impose sanctions against the plaintiff ( see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a]).