AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JENNIFER CLEMENTE, Respondent, v. CARL BONGIORNO SONS, INC., Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for leave to renew since it failed to contain a reasonable justification as to why the additional facts it offered upon seeking leave to renew were not presented on the original motion ( see CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]; Walsh v Schmigelski, 35 AD3d 849; Elder v Elder, 21 AD3d 1055; Hart v City of New York, 5 AD3d 438; cf., Lafferty v Eklecco, LLC, 34 AD3d 754).

In light of this determination we do not reach the appellant's remaining contentions.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLEMENTE v. CARL BONGIORNO SONS
(Apr 17, 2007)