Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The fair preponderance of the credible evidence adduced at the hearing supported the determination of the Family Court that the appellant committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree ( see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Santiago v Friedman, 35 AD3d 482). Accordingly, the order of protection was properly issued.
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.