Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Jerome N. DAIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John LAMANNA, Warden, Respondent — Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome N. Dais, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. Dais also appeals the district court's order denial of his subsequent motion for reconsideration and has filed a motion for summary judgment on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court, see Dais v. LaManna, No. 9:05-cv-02797-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 14 and Oct. 18, 2006). We deny Dais's motion for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAIS v. LAMANNA
(Apr 24, 2007)