Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Woodrow D. PUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Woodrow Pugh, appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, in which he challenged his sentence as being misapplied by the Department of Corrections. The Department of Corrections applied Pugh's sentences consecutively, while the trial court ordered them to be applied concurrently. We affirm the order under review, without prejudice to Pugh's ability to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the Leon County circuit court after he fully exhausts his administrative remedies. The record is silent as to whether Pugh has yet exhausted his administrative remedies. King v. State, 665 So.2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

See Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1213-14 (Fla. 2006).

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PUGH v. STATE
(Apr 25, 2007)