Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To prevail on their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants were required to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955). Since the defendants failed to address the plaintiff's allegation that she sustained a psychological injury constituting a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the accident, they failed to satisfy this burden. As a result, it is unnecessary to reach the question of whether the plaintiff's papers in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Coscia v 938 Trading Corp., 283 AD2d 538).