Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency ( see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793; Matter of Ashley M., 35 AD3d 612; Matter of Darnell C., 305 AD2d 405), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree ( see Penal Law § 195.05; Matter of Davan L., 91 NY2d 88, 91; Matter of Thomas L., 4 AD3d 295; Matter of Joshua C., 289 AD2d 1095; Matter of Michael C., 264 AD2d 842), and resisting arrest ( see Penal Law § 205.30; Matter of Thomas L., supra at 295; Matter of Kara M., 242 AD2d 630, 631). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the Family Court's fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence ( see Family Ct Act § 342.2; Matter of Garrick B., 30 AD3d 217; cf. CPL 470.15).