Defendant made a valid and enforceable waiver of his right to appeal ( see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The court did not conflate the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty, but separately explained that the waiver of the right to appeal was in consideration for the plea. Furthermore, defendant also signed a valid written waiver. Although that document was in English, there was a Spanish interpreter present throughout the plea proceeding.
This waiver forecloses review of his suppression and excessive sentence arguments. Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would reject these arguments.
However, as the People concede, since the court stated that it was imposing the minimum period of postrelease supervision permitted by law, but actually imposed a greater period ( see Penal Law § 70.45 [d]), the sentence should be modified accordingly.