The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility ( see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The conclusion is inescapable that defendant was caught in the act of stealing a chandelier worth over $5,000, and was not, as he claimed, in the process of buying it ( see People v Olivo, 52 NY2d 309). Among other things, the evidence showed that defendant stood on a table to remove the chandelier from a fifth-floor ceiling without seeking any assistance, placed it in a bag, falsely told a salesperson he had already paid for it, went to the first floor, passed the cash registers, and, when stopped at the exit by a security guard, fled back to the fifth floor. The jury could reject defendant's explanations for this behavior.
We find any error with regard to the court's receipt of uncharged crimes evidence to be harmless.