AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOEL KRAVATZ et al., Respondents, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that it did not receive prior written notice of the defect in the roadway that allegedly caused the injured plaintiff's fall ( see Lopez v G J Rudolph Inc., 20 AD3d 511, 512). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant created the alleged defect through an affirmative act of negligence ( see Daniels v City of New York, 29 AD3d 514, 515; Bielecki v City of New York, 14 AD3d 301). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRAVATZ v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
(May 29, 2007)