It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from judgments convicting him, upon his respective pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.50) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [5]). We reject the contention of defendant in each appeal that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request for youthful offender status. "The decision `whether to grant or deny youthful offender status rests within the sound discretion of the court and depends upon all the attending facts and circumstances of the case'" ( People v Williams, 204 AD2d 1002, 1002, lv denied 83 NY2d 973; see People v Henderson, 300 AD2d 1119, lv denied 100 NY2d 539; People v Ortega, 114 AD2d 912, lv denied 67 NY2d 887) and, here, the record in each appeal establishes that defendant has prior juvenile delinquency adjudications with respect to property-related offenses for which he had received dispositions that included probation and community service.