AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of SHONICA AHAILA S., Also known as SHONICA S. MERCYFIRST, Respondent; MARIE S., Appellant, et al., Respondent. In the Matter of KLOREL RUBEN-JAHI S., Also Known as KLOREL S. MERCYFIRST, Respondent; MARIE S., Appellant, et al., Respondent. In the Matter of KAMAL RAMAEL AKIN S., Also Known as KAMAL S. MERCYFIRST, Respondent; MARIE S., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Ordered that orders are reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing in accordance herewith and new determination thereafter.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Family Court failed to comply with the procedure set forth in the statute for the taking of expert testimony by a psychiatrist or psychologist in a parental rights termination case. Social Services Law § 384-b (6) (e) provides that in every termination of parental rights proceeding with a mental illness cause of action, "the judge shall order the parent to be examined by, and shall take the testimony of, a qualified psychiatrist or a psychologist." In the present case, the psychology expert who testified to the mother's mental illness did not examine the mother, but based his testimony entirely upon examination of the agency and hospital records. Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing in accordance herewith and a new determination thereafter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE AHAILA S
(Jun 12, 2007)