Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record of the Rodriguez hearing ( see People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445) supports the hearing court's determination that the witnesses were impervious to police suggestion, and thus that their identifications were confirmatory ( see People v Rodriguez, supra; People v Garner, 27 AD3d 764; People v James, 259 AD2d 709, 710; People v Russo, 243 AD2d 658, 659; People v Miller, 232 AD2d 247; People v Jenkins, 230 AD2d 806, 807; Matter of Bruce C., 224 AD2d 685, 686; People v Terry, 224 AD2d 202).
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove depraved indifference murder beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the elements of depraved indifference murder beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971; People v Campbell, 33 AD3d 716; People v Webb, 31 AD3d 796; People v Summerville, 22 AD3d 692). Further, the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's identity as the perpetrator.
Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses, and its determination should be accorded great deference on appeal ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 644-645; People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410, cert denied 542 US 946). Upon the exercise of our factual review power ( see CPL 470.15), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, supra).