Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in accepting a partial verdict ( see People v Spears, 276 AD2d 725; People v Andino, 210 AD2d 28). Neither CPL 310.70 nor any other provision of law precludes a trial court's inquiry into whether the jury, after a substantial period of deliberation, has agreed upon a verdict as to any of the counts submitted, and in then accepting a partial verdict ( see People v Spears, supra; People v Mendez, 221 AD2d 162, 163). Under the circumstances presented in this case, the trial court properly accepted the partial verdict in light of the fact that there was a medical issue concerning one juror and the jury had deliberated for approximately seven hours over a two-day period ( see People v Brown, 1 AD3d 147; People v Spears, supra; People v Andino, supra).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).