The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion based on a portion of the prosecutor's summation. The court prevented any possible prejudice when it sustained defendant's objection and provided suitable curative instructions ( see e.g. People v Singleton, 270 AD2d 190, lv denied 95 NY2d 858).
The court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender. The record establishes sufficient basis for an adjudication based on defendant's criminal history. Furthermore, the medical evidence of record indicates that defendant will still be physically capable of reverting to robbery should a shorter sentence be imposed. The adjudication procedure was constitutional ( see People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61, cert denied 546 US 984).