Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN, Petitioner, v. YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Respondents.

ORDER

KIMBERLY MUELLER, Magistrate Judge

On April 17, 2007, the court ordered respondents to file a response to petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus. On June 18, 2007 respondents filed a document in which they ask that this action, as well as the actions numbered 06-0016, 06-0018 and 06-2415 be assigned to "one court for the sake of judicial economy." The document filed by respondents on June 18, 2007 will be placed in the court's file and disregarded because respondents have not complied with Local Rule 83-123. Respondents will be granted ten days within which to file a notice of related cases under Local Rule 83-123 or 81-190(d). If respondents elect not to file a notice of related cases, they shall file their response to petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus within forty days.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents' June 18, 2007 "notice of related case" shall be placed in the court's file and disregarded.

2. Respondents are granted ten days within which to file a notice of related cases under Local Rule 83-123 or 81-190(d).

3. If respondents elect not to file a notice of related cases, their response to petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus shall be filed within forty days of this order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHERMAN v. YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF
(Jun 22, 2007)