AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRIAN CAUTHERS et al., Respondents, v. BRITE IDEAS, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

"[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact" ( Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Failure to make such a prima facie showing requires a denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers ( see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). The Supreme Court properly found that the appellant's proof, consisting solely of an attorney's affidavit, was insufficient to meet its initial burden ( see Jeune v O.T. Trans Mix Corp., 29 AD3d 635, 636 [2006]; Stahl v Stralberg, 287 AD2d 613, 614).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CAUTHERS v. BRITE IDEAS
(Jun 26, 2007)