Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction of assault in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Finger, 95 NY2d 894; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see Penal Law § 120.10; § 10.00 [10]; People v Crawford, 200 AD2d 683; Matter of Patrick W., 166 AD2d 652; People v Howard, 79 AD2d 1064). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power ( see CPL 470.15), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.