Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELIZABETH CLARK, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF OAKLAND, a California public entity, CHIEF WAYNE G. TUCKER, in his indi

AMENDED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER

CHARLES BREYER, District Judge

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys of record and pending Order of this Court, that the date set by this Court for hearing of defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be continued from August 10 to September 14, 2007.

Good cause exists for this extension as the parties and their attorneys have been diligently moving the case forward but despite best efforts, were not able to complete the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) until June 4, 2007. The parties have continued to cooperate with discovery efforts and defendants have produced hundreds of documents to plaintiff. Defendants hope to take plaintiff's deposition before filing moving papers. The additional time will allow them to file their motion in time to have a hearing of the matter on September 14, 2007.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered that the hearing date for Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to September 21, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLARK v. CITY OF OAKLAND
(Jul 2, 2007)