Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

STEVEN ALAN MAGRITZ, Petitioner, v. JAMES E. DOYLE, C. WILLIAM FOUST, MATTHEW J. FRANK, EMILY DAVIDSON and CHRIS KAMIN, Respondents.

ORDER

BARBARA CRABB, District Judge

Petitioner Steven Alan Magritz has requested leave to proceedin forma pauperis in this civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he alleges that respondents have violated his constitutional rights.

From the affidavit of indigency accompanying petitioner's proposed complaint, I cannot determine whether petitioner qualifies for indigent status. He has declared under penalty of perjury that he is "a poor person" and that he "has no assets." Nowhere in petitioner's affidavit does he indicate how he pays for his basic needs of housing, food and clothing.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that a decision whether petitioner Steven Alan Magritz may proceed in forma pauperis in this action is STAYED. Petitioner may have until July 11, 2007, in which to complete the enclosed affidavit of indigency form and return it to the court. Petitioner should take particular care to show the source of the funds he uses to pay for his basic necessities, such as food, clothing and shelter. If, by July 11, 2007, petitioner fails to provide the requested financial information, I will deny his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for his failure to show that he is indigent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAGRITZ v. DOYLE
(Jul 2, 2007)