Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MARCY NAPIER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE, ANTHONY LAGNESE, CHRISTOPHER BOUYE, JOHN DOE 1-10, Defendants.

ORDER

GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2007, after the plaintiff, Marcy Napier, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment was filed by defendants, City of New Castle, Anthony Lagnese and Christopher Bouye, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 4) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims for malicious prosecution against all defendants and her state law claim for malicious prosecution against all individual defendants remain.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order she must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NAPIER v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE
(Jul 3, 2007)