Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

STEPHEN R. MATTATALL v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, et al.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JACOB HAGOPIAN, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff Stephen R. Mattatall, pro se, is currently before the Court on a motion to appoint counsel to represent him in the instant civil action.

In the appropriate case, the Court may request that an attorney represent a plaintiff in a civil action. However, there is no absolute constitutional right to a "free lawyer" in a civil case.DesRosier v. Moran, 949 F.2d 15, 23 (1st Cir. 1991). Absent exceptional circumstances, the Court can not appoint counsel in a civil matter. Id. At 23. Exceptional circumstances can include, inter alia, the merits of the case, the complexity of the legal issues, and the litigant's ability to represent himself. Id.

Here, I have reviewed the plaintiff's complaint and the motions that he has filed in this case. The issues presented in the complaint are not so complex that the plaintiff is unable to represent himself. Moreover, plaintiff's filings demonstrate that he is able to present the facts and the issues himself. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTATALL v. STATE
(Jul 2, 2007)