AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

TAHRIR SHAKIR KALASHO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. REPUBLIC OF IRAQ, et al., Defendants.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

R. WHALEN, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum [Docket #46].

By separate Report and Recommendation, the undersigned has recommended that a default judgment enter against Defendant Republic of Iraq, and that the District Court conduct a hearing on damages, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). The matter is pending before the District Judge, who may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the Report and Recommendation. At this juncture, therefore, the request to bring the Plaintiff (who is a state prison inmate) to this Court to appear at the Rule 55(b) hearing is premature.

In addition, Plaintiff asks that the writ direct that the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) transfer him to a Detroit prison so that counsel will have more convenient access. That is not the purpose of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, nor does the Court have the authority to order the MDOC to transfer an inmate from one prison to another. The Court only has the authority, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(5), to order that the inmate be brought to court.

If the District Judge orders a hearing, the Plaintiff may request a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. At this time, however, Plaintiff's petition [Docket #46] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KALASHO v. REPUBLIC OF IRAQ
(Jul 27, 2007)