AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SREEKUMAR SOMASEKHARAN, ANIL ANTONY, and PAUL MANI, Plaintiffs, v. LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES, INC. Defendant.

ORDER

MICHAEL McCUSKEY, District Judge

A Report and Recommendation (#15) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on July 13, 2007. More than ten (10) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (#15) is accepted by this court.
(2) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#4) is DENIED.
(3) Defendant is allowed twenty-one (21) days to file its Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint.
(4) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SOMASEKHARAN v. LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES, INC. (C.D.Ill. 8-1-2007)
(Aug 1, 2007)