AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of STEVEN S. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner sent a letter to the deputy superintendent of programs at the correctional facility where he was incarcerated complaining about a correction counselor and comparing him to a former supervisor whom he had murdered. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats and was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the letter and petitioner's admission that he authored the letter, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Alston v Goord, 25 AD3d 852, 852; Matter of Jones v Department of Correctional Servs. of State of N.Y., 283 AD2d 805, 805). Petitioner's assertion that the letter was misinterpreted presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Alston v Goord, supra at 852; Matter of McFadden v Armmitage, 1 AD3d 670, 670-671). His claim of Hearing Officer bias has not been preserved for our review.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROBINSON v. DONALD
(Aug 2, 2007)